Google

2007/12/31

High Frequency Warfare

You go to the bar and suddenly you start to drink. You know you are drinking too much and don't know why, this is usually for two reasons:

  • You are trying to escape from your systematizing brain.
  • YOU ARE BEING AMOGGED.
  • Or a mix of the two.

The more alpha man (or woman, my experience and some recent studies are telling women build hierarchies even deeper than men *1) is the more in state *2. Normally, the "state" or being in the zone equals some value enjoyment perception-projection and you try to get the state without the value's enjoyment by only drinking. This can work, it can produce a feedback that can converge or diverge as high status or low but a higher cost, but WE DON'T WANT TO BE GUIDED BY THE SITUATION in a bar or in general (a bar or your whole life is the same), we want to CREATE situations, we are world transforming FORCES. The only thing that counts are your beliefs and drinking can be something viewed by yourself as trying something, that will jeopardize your high status beliefs. Your beliefs is the only thing that you have to take care of in the face of this planet, people will love you for that.

This is meant to be a life direction setting article; I just started with alcohol because is often used instead of a direction in life. IT'S RETARDED TO HELP PEOPLE TO QUIT ALCOHOL JUST SAYING "QUIT

ALCOHOL" *3, instead of that nonsense I'll tell you WHAT TO DO. I want to go deeper now, your options:

> You can stay low status.

> You can go YANG (subtle YANG, overtly YANG is a CAPITALIZATION of low status).

> No more options.

If you are high status ok but trust me, 99% of men are low status and they don't know.

Why do you want to become a master AMOGger?

Because you cannot be very good in ANY OTHER AREA of your life but you will perform WELL. This is KEY; this is the MOST IMPORTANT sport people practice. This is also your ONLY ARMOUR in the modern social construction, everything else is SITUATIONAL. Think deep and tell me something that can be more important, post it here as a comment. Trust me, this is a huge leap in your life.

I don't like and probably you don't like too but IS HERE WHERE WE ARE. If you don't like AMOG people, be a master AMOGger TO NOT SUFFER from it. If you want to deploy an anti-AMOGging shield you have to recognize that shit BUT don't remain in the trap of "I know what you are consciously/unconsciously doing" you MUST project yourself anti-AMOGged, your projection must be your perception.

Practice in your house like DeNiro.

Two Rules:

Don't AMOG your friends, STUPID! Your friends (if truly are friends), loves to be with you and respect you for the withdrawal that can suppose losing you. So… you too!

TRAP: Throw each other's ball because it pumps state and dissolve tensions but NOT HARD-AMOG you entourage.

Don't AMOG people in high status social clogged situations, FOOL. Don't AMOG the police when you are getting a ticked, he is probably a child in uniform but the situation is going to get worse if you do. Don't AMOG those roles, people with an official role. Don't AMOG SITUATIONS you cannot AMOG.

AMOG any other person and you became POWERFUL. AMOGging sexual targeted women is a NEG, AMOGging sexual targeted men is a shit-test. So it works.

If you think this shit doesn't work is because YOU are not doing it enough.

The Medication / Schizophrenia:

Usually SCHIZOPHRENIA IS BULLSHIT. Some people develop great kind of sense to detect the AMOGging come from their environment to themselves but don't go a step further recognizing it like something external. Logically their environment protect itself accusing the people with that great perception to have SCHIZOPHRENIA and "HELP" themselves to go to the STUPID doctor to kill their senses in a act of toxic medical death.

Ignore ACADEMIC PSYCHOLOGY because is an EVOLVED SYSTEM TO MAINTAIN PEOPLE'S LOW STATUS.

Art:

http://es.youtube.com/watch?v=s6JlChbNQHE&feature=related

       

*1: The only difference is where value resides but search for power is ingrained in all of us even in woman BECAUSE it can't cut the replication AVAILABILITY for the targeted man and availability TRANSMIT attraction too. The "woman selecting man" model of the human world is the most fitting one.

*2: Read great product Real Social Dynamics' Blueprint and trust every single word.

*3: This is also a form of AMOGging.

         

HERE IS:

I was doing an immense mental effort (and still I'm doing) to product an abstract map of the social process involved in the act of AMOGging. I started with the ideas of the FUCKING MOST IMPORTANT PEOPLE studying social systems.

Remember one thing. Scaling the pecking order is a PATTERN BREAKING THING, it can't be done effortlessly. Normally, AMOGging is a big mental effort in which you imagine the target situation and then you simply walk the way BECAUSE it's the way you want to live. It can cause headache in the weaker frames because beliefs changing is a very energetic process in the brain.

TRAP: Trying to show you are an "Illuminated". Don't do that.

         

* Any kind of alpha behavior.

ANTIDOTE: Usually alpha behaviors are reactive! If doesn't, they can be reframed as reactive. The stronger the frame of your opposition the more powerful can be reframed! Each time someone lays a hand on someone can be viewed as an act of TRYING to out-alpha that person, not as an alpha behavior. If you reframe in your mind (or any other kind of alpha behavior) your eyes WILL TELL EVERYBODY (project it!) they are trying to get your value. "Why the hell my uncle deliberately calls me BOY? Because am I a boy? hahahah. I'm an OVERHEADED SOCIAL DEMON. You are a FUCKING MATHS STUNDENT. It's just HIS FEAR." You are comfortable into your self-built body temple. Your purpose is not to lose opportunities in life not take over anyone.

TRAP: Do not built ego constraints to get this working. You are here reading this so you are probably already a social Kasparov but it's just an example.

         

* theApproach's DEVI components: Dominance, Emotion, Variety, Immersion. Those are the parameters of alphaness.

ANTIDOTE: Take care of that.

         

* Tyler's AMOG components.

I identified the following categories in which the examples posted by Tyler can reside (normally a combination of those):

Rationalize: Attacks dEVI in a way that it's polite. The emotion is killed by forcing the rational part of the brain to consume more energy. Variety can be crippled with the same conversation thread again and again. Immersion is lost by forcing the victims to be self-conscious.

·         Rationalize the situation: People have NO imagination when wanting to sick you consciously or unconsciously. The threads started by them are always: "work", "studies", "relationships", "old friends in common" and "are you disappeared". You can think this is normal and it can be but think… it hurts your alphaness.

ANTIDOTE: The way you respond set your alphaness, the best way is to introduce an situational relevant DHV story. You can reframe those questions as bored too.

·         Characterize the behavior or looks: Transform a person into a puppet.

·         Attribution Theory based Rationalizing: Make people success appear situational.

Patronize: Attacks Devi. The dominance is enveloped by the aggressor's dominance in a way that appears like both are in the same team. The situation evolves in a way the "patronizer" can deviate the "patronized" from his goals in a friendly way. Most important patronizing are:

    "Present people under supervision" ANTIDOTE: "So how do you all know each other?" And talk DIRECTLY. (Remember Erik von Markovic)

    "Giving a poisoned advice" ANTIDOTE: Choose your direction.

    "Desiring the best only verbally" ANTIDOTE: Stab Judas.

    "Good luck!" or "Look after yourself" In a way that he set the "you need luck" or "you need to improve your life" frame.

ANTIDOTE: "Yeah," and repeat the patronizing sentence in a disinterested way.

    Conveying your results in a way he set the "enjoy the limited and no so abundant success in your life".

ANTIDOTE: Make your success appear effortlessly. (Remember Balthasar Gracian)

    Judging you even if positive.

        TRAP: You can become addicted to this feedback and then need it. Don't do that.

ANTIDOTE: DECLARE the underground existing war. (REMEMBER TO SHIFT YOUR FOCUS)

Disinterest: Attacks DEvi. Deliberately cut off a thread and seek other stimulation better than what some people higher in the pecking order is telling you. You probably want to do EVEN if the stimulation you are seeking can't be better than the AMMOGged man's conversation. You enter "stimulation seeking zombie" frame.

ANTIDOTE: "Look!", and tell the same in a reassured DEVI way. Social Clog what you are saying with the people around.

TRAP: Don't be a value taker.

·         Override the other person's conversation.

ANTIDOTE: Call on it in an assertive way.

Fuse: Attacks Devi. Assuming and conveying the underlying situational social meaning are not big deal for you and near traumatic for the people around. It's often ironic but this is "charismatic" by definition. Any kind of social pressure fits in here.

ANTIDOTE: I don't take care even more than you. Use social pressure as GASOLINE to your engine. Embrace the Lucifer's Principle, it RULES THE EARTH. Let people show their distress taking over their bodies while you don't do any signal of friction.

TRAP: Loose your social outcome instead of not get emotionally involved.

         

* Demeaning names: Are a form of Patronizing and/or Fusing.

ANTIDOTE: The best way to handle it is a STRONG form of Fusing followed (if needed) by Patronizing.

         

* Physical maneuvers: Here you have:

·         Touching to show dominance.

ANTIDOTE: Touch back. Apply Disinterest reframing their alpha behavior as being boring.

·         Excluding from a group or blocking an interest point.

ANTIDOTE: Apply Fuse mindfucking yourself and tell everybody what you want in a way you assume less reaction than the people around.

·         Personal space invasion.

ANTIDOTE: Apply back. Deny him target displaying that you don't acknowledge him invasion.

         

* Self-Worth aberrations. Those affect the vaC component of the theApproach's VAC model in opposition to the others listed here that affects Vac. It can be even more powerful and subtle.

Hurt some person's Self-Worth: Conveying that what:

·         Some people wants is out of reach.

·         Some people have is a lucky big deal.

Assuming someone's high compliance:

·         Suffering: fools, boring, drama and hurry.

ANTIDOTE: Reframe as having a weak personality.

·         Ask for hilarious things or straight exhort. Even if you don't submit, the only act of ask (even more if it's showing in public) can display you as a slave.

ANTIDOTE: Blow it as a joke. Reframe it as a Patronizing in a DEEP way.

         

* Cialdini's Principle of Liking manipulation:

The straightest parameter to use for "liking" in a person is Realist/Cynic/Idealist. You can use it for Patronizing or Fusing.

Realist: "The clever", "So distrustful".

Cynic: "People just don't know", "So hopeless, pessimistic".

Idealist: "People are what counts", "Help and collaboration".

       

* Lifestyle pitfalls: Those are things to avoid in a healthy life but so common…

Displaying that someone has those traits may cause your perceived pecking order escalation. You can use any trace of those traits to Patronize "Giving a poisoned advice" to "HELP":

·         Bingeing, Pleasing, Whining, Procrastinating, Avoiding, Crippling and Parading.

You can reframe alpha traits into those categories too:

·         Persistence as foolish procrastination.

·         Intrepid or spontaneous as foolish parading.

·         Assertiveness as whining.

         

* Relationship pitfalls: Read the experts in BFDestroying.

         

* LAS VEGAS pitfalls. Displaying that someone doesn't have LAS VEGAS lifestyle traits.

         

* Secret Society pitfalls. Displaying that someone doesn't conform to Tyler's S.S. model rules.

         

* Sexual role aberrations. It works for sexual AMOGging but will also work for every situation because sex is inner-linked with status.

·         Role failing. Make the victim appear failing to escalate sexually in a proper way.

ANTIDOTE: Blow up and reframe it as the AMOGger cannot trigger the S/C Switch, so is beta because has to chase woman instead of having woman chasing him. So he has seen the situation in that way, as an escalation fault.

·         Sex closeness testing. A person who is not familiar with sex denotes low status. The signs of deception are indications of low value. It can be used to escalate pecking order by bringing up sexual threads in the conversation. It can be used as Fusing too.

·         "Casual" sexual exhibition assuming sexless target and disrespect. Usually from parents to children.

ANTIDOTE: Fuse as "happy enjoyable porn". If you are a woman it will be much harder, near impossible, cause the globalized ingrained shit-test.

         

* Blowing their fucking S/C sexual Switches up. It works for sexual AMOGging and status too.

This is fucking subtle and fucking common, fucking dangerous. Near by definition, an alpha male has woman chasing him for sex while beta are only being testing sometimes by woman. The alphaness in the interaction with other males assures protection in the interchange of values so it's a Social Clogged chasing. So SUBTLE but the only trace of a woman screening a man again and again and not starting to chase for sex is a real BETA SCENARIO for him.

ANTIDOTE: RESPOND firmly every time a clueless man tries to say EVEN IN THE MOST SUBTLE WAYS that you don't fire that trigger.

2 comments:

Mode said...

Hey, that's an awesome post on amogging. I've been looking for something like this for a long time. Quick question it possible that an amogger can actually lower his value by amogging why too much?

NewEden said...

Thanks! I know it seems so war-like and that can be the reason why you ask that but it's a compilation of scenarios people can be. Normally only one or two things of this happens.
On the other side, alpha people do all this stuff naturally and never acknowledge "this is too much responding". Never get self-conscious about that.
Anyway, if someone in certain situation NEEDS or HAS TO do a lot of this stuff, NORMALLY is Beta in that situation (or immersed in a high reward/risk situation) but… you’ll have always the game to play.
Stay tuned, I have some more ideas, examples and solid whole thing view for the second revision!